Harassing Calls Made by
Employee(s) of Dart Trucking and/or T&L Leasing
The following complaint was made
to the Seattle Police when hang-up calls to my number got out of
control. As verified by polygraph, Delann Lamb did acknowledge a
number of hang-up calls made to me, shortly after I quit, and she did
apologize for them. But the calls continued, sometimes with Lamb
identifying herself, more often not (see polygraph #2). Finally, as
the reader can see, the volume of calls became unbearable, and a
complaint was filed. A copy of this complaint was also sent to Tift,
their infamous "attorney". Note that the calls began in
earnest only a few days before the original hearing back on 3-23-01.
Was this meant to scare me off? The calls tapered off after the
complaint was filed, but continued at a lower level, without stop, for
the next five or eight months or so. A few days before the appeal was
scheduled to be heard in the fall of 2001, the calls picked up again
at the rate of a dozen or more per hour. They came in every couple of
minutes as I sat with my attorney. After the appeals hearing, they
tapered off again.
So who made all these harassing
calls? We know that the first few came directly from the office phone
in the Dart office, by Lamb's own admission, and
by the Qwest traces. It seems Lamb really didn't like being served notice
to cease and desist contacting me, so she contacted me repeatedly,
apparently for just spite, in those first few weeks.
But who made all the other
dozens or hundreds of calls over the next half a year, and most often
right around the times that hearings were scheduled? I guess the
reader will just have to make up his or her own mind, since, as yet,
no conclusive proof exists.
Seattle Police Department
810 Virginia Street
We are experiencing hang-up calls which began approximately 3-19-01.
The number in question is: 206-xxxxxxxxxxx
We have only begun logging the calls in the last few days. A partial list
9-23-01 7:22 a.m.
3-22-01 7:22 a.m.
3-24-01 9:04 a.m., 9:23 a.m., 9:29 a.m., 12:15 p.m., 14:25 p.m., 13:42 p.m.,
Obviously, the frequency is increasing. Neither *69 or *57 is able to
produce a number. Caller ID lists all information as "Unavailable".
I am enclosing two documents which may help your office glean an insight
into this case. There is a great deal more to this case than
this, but this is all that concerns the telephone company at this time.
We request a reply. You are herewith authorized to place a trace on our
To Seattle PD: Please consider this a formal complaint, and we do request a case number. We are experiencing no other conflicts of any kind with
any other persons.
xxxx xxx xxx., Seattle, WA., xxxxx